Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-14 23:32:16

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
Previous message: Jeff Garland: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
In reply to: Vinnie Falco: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 22:52, Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:00 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users <boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > ...would you use it?
>
> Never again. Howard told me so, and I agreed.

This *is* actually a helpful comment :)
Thanks,

--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
Previous message: Jeff Garland: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
In reply to: Vinnie Falco: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garland: "Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net