Boost Users :
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-06 20:19:30
On 29.02.20 03:50, Andrew McFarlane via Boost-users wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been using Boost.Test for about a month now. Big fan so far,
> except for the atrocious compilation times, hence why I am moving toward
> using the shared library.
> using b2 to build and install Boost.Test's libs was simple enough,
> though after making the noted changes here:
In 99.9% of the time, you do not need this functionality. The automatic
test registration just works, and with any variants (shared included).
For shared, you need to define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1 and a single
translation unit /per executable/ containing either BOOST_TEST_MAIN or
Can I help getting on tracks?
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net