Re: (no subject)

From: Leon Mlakar (leon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-11 08:24:33

The very first thing that comes to my mind is the suggestion to use the 
full namespace path (::xxx::FirstState). I know that MSVC and gcc do not 
always agree on  resolving the relative namespace paths.

Cheers,
Leon

Disclaimer: This is before-the-first-morning-coffee reply. It may be 
completely off.

On 10.03.2021 22:55, Jinlong Shen via Boost-users wrote:
> Dear Madam/Sir,
>
> I used the boost::statechart asynchronous_state_machine to create a 
> simple state machine. The state machine, the events and states are 
> regular classes and are not class templates.
>
> Everything builds and works well on linux and qnx platform. However, 
> on windows I got message that the the initial state is undefined. I 
> think I have dealt with forward declaration well since it is build on 
> linux and qnx. On Windows microsoft this compiler is used: Microsoft 
> (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.24215.1 for x64
>
> The error message is like this.
>
> (ClCompile target) -> C:\Program 
> Files\boost_1_64_0\boost/statechart/state_machine.hpp(701): error 
> C2027: use of undefined type 'xxxx::FirstState'
> C:\Program Files\boost_1_64_0\boost/statechart/state_machine.hpp(701): 
> error C3861: 'initial_deep_construct': identifier not found
>
> Any hint how it could be wrong with Microsoft C++?
>
> Best regards,
> Jinlong Shen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users