|
Boost Users : |
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-04-07 18:37:00
On 4/7/2021 2:15 PM, Anil Muthigi via Boost-users wrote:
> I dont think so...
If it is available why do you think variant would not support it ?
> I guess int128_t under boost/multiprecision/cpp_int is the only viable
> option.
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 11:39 pm David Frank via Boost-users,
> <boost-users_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> especially the gnu __int128?
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net