Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: chengm349_at_[hidden]
Date: 2021-07-28 21:16:08

so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs?

Sent from my Huawei Mobile

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID
From: Richard Damon via Boost-users
CC: Richard Damon

On 7/27/21 11:34 PM, Ming Cheng via Boost-users wrote:
> I have a UUID requirement as:
> * Each session will also be represented with a Universally Unique ID
> (UUID), which should be a current timestamp
> * a unique UUID value set by the customer as a 64-bit value. CME
> Group recommends using the system timestamp which represents the
> number of microseconds since epoch (Jan 1, 1970) as the timestamp.
> * I also need to save it in a Linux file and rebuild the UUID from
> the saved value.
> Wondering whether boost UUID code can support it?  I checked online
> document and seems to me quite difficulty except archiving.
My first thought is someone doesn't know what a UUID is. 'The Current
Timestamp' is NOT a UUID, and the chance of duplicates is going to be
reasonable high if sessions might be started on multiple machines at
about the same time.

Richard Damon

Boost-users mailing list

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at