Subject: [ggl] pre-/post-increment op on iterators
From: Barend Gehrels (Barend.Gehrels)
Date: 2009-04-26 04:13:36
> Certainly, replacing all in one shot is potentially risky and would be
> time consuming, so automatic update is not possible.
> I will be replacing it by-the-way while doing other refactoring work - I
> spot post-increment used for iterator, then I check if it's safe to
> replace with pre-increment and I apply changes or add TODO comment if
> it's not obvious without running the code.
> So, it's going to be applied in pieces :-)
OK, sounds good!
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net