Geometry Boost List: [ggl] Re: segment iterators [was: pre-/post-increment op on iterators]

Subject: [ggl] Re: segment iterators [was: pre-/post-increment op on iterators]
From: Barend Gehrels (Barend.Gehrels)
Date: 2009-05-01 04:58:56

>>> terators, it is, but it has drawbacks and problems as
>>> mentioned above.
>>>
>>> To summary, we've two options. Let's discuss which one to use.
>>>       
>> The advantages of my proposition are too uncertain compared to the big
>> drawback you mentioned, so I'd eventually stick to your solution.
>>     
>
> OK. I will work on it tomorrow.
>   
Great.

I just noticed the title of the keynote next week, "Iterators Must Go", 
by Andrei Alexandrescu :-)
So I asked for segment-iterators, and still think they are very useful 
(we use them a lot!), we'll see what he'll say...

Regards, Barend

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ggl/attachments/20090501/5abe0a8d/attachment-0001.html