Geometry :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [ggl] Re: segment iterators [was: pre-/post-increment op on iterators]
From: Barend (barend)
Date: 2009-05-05 09:56:52

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "[ggl] inline keyword in class definition"
Previous message: Barend: "[ggl] distance and reversible"
In reply to: Bruno Lalande: "[ggl] Re: segment iterators [was: pre-/post-increment op on iterators]"

>>> I just noticed the title of the keynote next week, "Iterators Must Go",
>>>
>
> Yep I've been wondering about this provocative title for long :-) If I
> remember well this keynote was planned yesterday, so what was it about
> finally?
>
It is tomorrow...
Barend

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ggl/attachments/20090505/e52b8331/attachment.html

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "[ggl] inline keyword in class definition"
Previous message: Barend: "[ggl] distance and reversible"
In reply to: Bruno Lalande: "[ggl] Re: segment iterators [was: pre-/post-increment op on iterators]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net