Boost logo

Geometry :

Subject: [ggl] Compilation warning level
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2009-05-11 17:36:31

Barend Gehrels wrote:
>> I second this idea. Very good.
>> I've started to think of doing quick rewrite of Shapelib to a
>> single-header file with a shapefile class providing iterator-based
>> interface, so it's just easy to read test files.
>> I eventually deferred this idea to limit distractions for now :-)
> Yep, for another reason as well: I have a shape-file implementation
> (since 1995) which can eventually be converted. It's part of our
> original library. It's still being used, all those years, so
> close-to-perfect for all shapefiles (there are sometimes some deviations
> in it, especially in the order of multi-polygons and holes).
> So if ever necessary I (or someone else) can revise that one. Actually
> it already works with our geometries. But the style is not yet OK and
> there are many dependencies on other classes and files.


Cool, it's interesting.
I'll take the subject up here when I'm back to it.

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,
Charter Member of OSGeo,

Geometry list run by mateusz at