Subject: [ggl] Concept names and template parameters
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande)
Date: 2009-06-13 17:01:40
> This is of course not compilable. So a logical thing to do would be placing
> all concepts in a namespace "concept". It would then be:
> BOOST_CONCEPT_ASSERT( (concept::Point<Point>) );
> which is acceptible, and actually looks OK. So this is my proposal. Placing
> all concepts in namespace "concept".
Yep, sounds perfect to me. It's even slightly better since it states
more clearly that we are checking our point against a concept class.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net