Subject: [ggl] [Trac] Components
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2009-06-16 17:35:20
Barend Gehrels wrote:
>> 1. <NAME> - dedicated to non-source issues related to GGL
>> 2. ggl::NAME - dedicated to GGL source code modules
>> Does it make sense?
> Sure, good idea!
> A few remarks though
> - these names mean the folder structure, not the namespaces.
Yes, I remember.
> Would it then be better to call them ggl/algorithms, ggl/strategies, etc?
> - if yes, can you add ggl/core/concepts, ggl/strategies, ggl/iterators,
Good point. I'll fix that.
> - what is the difference between ggl::all and unspecified?
It proposes the former as source code related reports,
compilation warnings, coding refactoring, style, library-wide issues
and the latter is just unspecified, users may not know what to select.
To make the list short, perhaps just 'ggl' as default component is better.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net