Boost logo

Geometry :

Subject: [ggl] Projections: Patch to get access to parameters
From: Chris Browet (cbro)
Date: 2009-06-19 04:27:21

> Back to complicated code, I'm not sure how it complicates it.
> If "complex-looking code" would be the only reasons, I think it's better
> to leave it as is.

My concern is that I had to hardcode the "parameters" type at the
"projection" level while it is templatized at the "base..." level.
It is IMHO very ugly but doing it properly would probably have complicated
the code unnecessarily...

Unless you consider that a different "base..." would also mean different
"projection" and that the "projection" in its current state requires

- Chris -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Geometry list run by mateusz at