Subject: [ggl] Efficient rotation about a point
From: Lee (lee)
Date: 2009-12-02 12:42:46
Barend Gehrels wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>> I wonder, is there really any benefit in having composable-matrix +
>> ublas_transformer over having
>> composable (affine) transformers?
>> As a user, I'm looking at the existing rotate/translate/scale
>> transformers and being frustrated by the
>> thought "if only I could compose these things!". Is matrix +
>> ublas_transformer really the answer to
> We don't want to duplicate functionality from uBlas or another matrix
> library, but use it.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net