Subject: [ggl] Documenting parameters
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2010-10-20 14:56:34
On 20/10/10 13:29, Barend Gehrels wrote:
> hi Mateusz,
> OK, nice you restarted. Most things we discussed on GT.
Yes, we've discussed. Most things are clear.
> I'm offline next days and keep this very short.
>> The new version of documentation has merged the description of template
>> parameters with run-time call parameters. I am not convinced it's a good
>> idea. In the previous version, there were two tables: Template
>> parameters and Parameters.
> Until now I still think it a good idea, but giving the template
> parameters a hyperlink to their concept is a great idea.
> What do others find?
Right, what folks thing?
>> in Boost.Asio. For instance:
>> Note, how neatly the templates are documented.
> Actually... I don't see a proper documentation of template parameters
I meant presentation: the type links to concept.
>> Name of template
>> parameter is a link to description of concept / requirements
>> which should be modelled by type passed to the template.
> Yep, great
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net