Subject: Re: [geometry] translation and rotation proposal
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 17:55:04
On 19-6-2013 23:26, Bruno Lalande wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> OK, I agree that having those concepts could indeed allow those
> strategies to be more generic, and would bring more possibilities. We
> can go that way then. However I'd advise to concentrate on one concept
> at a time and get it right, rather than doing all 3 at the same time.
> Not to mention it will make the technical discussions much easier.
> Since vector is something that was discussed in the past and expressed
> as a need by users, I'd start with that.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net