Subject: Re: [geometry] ring, multi_polygon concepts too limited or not
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-06 13:54:39
On 4-9-2013 20:59, lepere renaud wrote:
> Le 04/09/2013 17:18, Barend Gehrels a écrit :
>>> No sorry there is new problem, but it is better
>>> 1. in append_no_dups_or_spikes.hpp with the range.erase(it) method.
>>> Perhaps the erase method could be simulated by creating a new range
>>> copy but this could be inefficient if erase at the end...
>> This is now fixed in trunk.
>> The checks for non-const multi-geometries are now extended in trunk.
>> Could you give it one more try? Thanks.
> Everything is ok now.
> Thanks !
OK! Thanks again for reporting and testing.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net