Subject: Re: [geometry] volatile polygon
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-25 17:13:43
On 25 November 2013 21:31, Barend Gehrels <barend_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Bruno Lalande wrote On 25-11-2013 22:26:
>> Maybe we should just generally use remove_cv instead of remove_const? I
>> think a lot of Boost libraries do that.
> Right, of course. Agreed, we should do that.
If I may, Bruno's got very good point!
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net