Subject: Re: [geometry] Boost.Geometry models UDLs
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-24 04:46:45
Sorry for the late reaction. Good idea indeed. Not sure we need Proto,
given the limited number of operators will be using (just one AFAICT). We
should try without first. Also, Proto is a very complex library and trying
to manually do its job first is usually a good way to understand it.
Regarding C++11 I guess it's a more general question of which direction
Boost generally want to take...
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net