Boost logo

Geometry :

Subject: Re: [geometry] Boost.Geometry models initializer_lists (was: Boost.Geometry models UDLs)
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-07 17:35:23


Hi,

Do you think that the support for C++11 initializer_list is needed (and
> sufficient). It would probably look like this:
>
> polygon_type polygon{ {{0, 0},{0, 10},{10, 10},{10, 0},{0, 0}} ,
> {{1, 1},{2, 1},{2, 2},{1, 2},{1, 1}} };
>
> or that we should also provide a chaining tool working in C++98?
>

Do we really have the choice? Aren't Boost libraries supposed to always
support pure C++98?

Bruno



Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net