Boost logo

Geometry :

Subject: Re: [geometry] Setting up Travis CI for Boost.Geometry
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-10 15:35:47

Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> We have build status per branch (after last commit).
> We decide that we build only those parts that are actively maintained.
> We get green, we're good.
> We get red, we must fix to get green.
> In the Boost.Geometry upstream, this is all we should care about, really:
> branch | status
> -----------------------
> develop | GREEN
> master | GREEN
> IMHO, users should be able to get stable (master) or cutting edge (develop)
> package of what is actively maintained, without any unsupported legacies.

Yes, you're right.
Furthermore this should encourage people to fix all bugs, not only e.g.
the ones in the main part.
And it'd be indeed clear for the users if the current version is ok or


Geometry list run by mateusz at