
Geometry : 
Subject: Re: [geometry] Compile Error with douglas peucker
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 20150103 13:15:28
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Menzel schreef op 312015 om 18:43:
> May I humbly bump this...
>
> I have a standanlone cpp file attached for your convenience but it's
> really just those lines...
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
> Stephan
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Stephan Menzel
> <stephan.menzel_at_[hidden] <mailto:stephan.menzel_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to port existing and working code from 1.54 to above
> and ever since 1.55 there's a compile error on both gcc and VC9 here:
>
> typedef boost::geometry::model::point<double, 3,
> boost::geometry::cs::cartesian> Point;
> typedef boost::geometry::model::box<Point> BoundingBox;
> typedef boost::geometry::model::segment<Point> Segment;
> typedef boost::geometry::model::linestring<Point> LineString;
>
> // LineString raw is being filled
> LineString ret;
>
> typedef
> boost::geometry::strategy::distance::projected_point<Point>
> PointSegmentDistanceStrategy;
> typedef
> boost::geometry::strategy::simplify::douglas_peucker<Point,
> PointSegmentDistanceStrategy> SimplificationStrategy;
> SimplificationStrategy strat;
> boost::geometry::simplify<LineString, double,
> SimplificationStrategy>(raw, ret, 20, strat);
>
Sorry for the late reaction.
I had to dig it up but projected_point<Point> is now not templated
anymore with Point but with an optional calculation type. So saying the
next is OK:
* typedef boost::geometry::strategy::distance::projected_point<>
PointSegmentDistanceStrategy;**
* typedef
boost::geometry::strategy::simplify::douglas_peucker<Point,
PointSegmentDistanceStrategy> SimplificationStrategy;
SimplificationStrategy strat;
and then one of:
boost::geometry::simplify<LineString, double,
SimplificationStrategy>(raw, ret, 20, strat);
boost::geometry::simplify(raw, ret, 20, strat);
boost::geometry::simplify(raw, ret, 20);
(because you use the default simplify strategy, you don't have to
mention it)
This change was already done in July 2013 (so indeed, as you mentioned,
for 1.55) and alas it was mentioned in the release notes but as a TODO
(to be documented) item. Sorry for the inconvience.
Regards, Barend
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net