Geometry Boost List: Re: [geometry] [External] : Re: Potential Gsoc project topic

From: Ayush Gupta (ayush.gupta02071_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-04-01 22:04:09

Hello everyone,
I drafted a proposal on the topic discussed before with Vissarion.
Here is the link to my proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ex_4Up9gGowGGW0SO16ARx_CeU75dGpqME7nDaDFnlI/edit?usp=sharing
It would be great if the community suggests some changes.
If all the necessary details have been mentioned, I will submit the
proposal.
Regards,
Ayush

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 2:30 PM Vissarion Fysikopoulos via Geometry <
geometry_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> On 3/21/21 11:38 AM, Ayush Gupta via Geometry wrote:
>
> Or what I can do is implement the 3d convex hull algorithms(Quickhull or
> randomized incremental) for multipoint and store the hull in custom made
> polyhedral surfaces following the boost standards as much as possible.
> For the competency test, I would be implementing the algorithms for
> cartesian coordinates.
> Is that fine Vissarion?
>
> ok
>
> Regards,
>
> It would be really helpful if a confirmation is received as early as
> possible.
> Regards
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ayush Gupta <ayush.gupta02071_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> I had a doubt regarding the competency test for GSoC 2021. As per
>> Vissarion's suggestion, a prototype implementation of 3d convex hull would
>> be accepted as a competency test. But since the implementation for
>> polyhedral surfaces is just in a prototype stage and not fully
>> implemented(like the halfedges and their relation with the polyhedral
>> surfaces, vertices, etc which would be implemented before the GSoC coding
>> phase starts)  , the 3d convex hull algorithm(using a quickhull or
>> randomized incremental algorithm) implementation would be difficult. So,
>> could you please suggest another implementation that would be accepted as a
>> competency test.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ayush
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:03 PM Vissarion Fisikopoulos via Geometry <
>> geometry_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ayush,
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing the proposal.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 15:00, Ayush Gupta <ayush.gupta02071_at_[hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As per the suggestions of Vissarion, I drafted a project proposal on
>>>> the idea proposed. The draft is incomplete for now and is a basic version
>>>> of the final proposal. The reason for posting the incomplete proposal here
>>>> is that I had some queries regarding my proposal, and it would be great if
>>>> they were answered before moving forward.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is the project proposed too short or too long to be finished within
>>>> the time frame?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it is OK.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2) Are more details required on the implementation of the proposed
>>>> topics?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is too brief. For example what algorithms are you going to
>>> implement? Are those algorithms already implemented in some other library?
>>> Do you have experience in implementing similar (computational geometry)
>>> algorithms in the past? If not you have to provide evidence for your
>>> ability/background on implementing such algorithms before the application
>>> by probably implementing a small part of the proposal e.g. a prototype of
>>> 3d convex hull algorithm.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Vissarion
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 15:04, Ayush Gupta via Geometry <
>>> geometry_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As per the suggestions of Vissarion, I drafted a project proposal on
>>>> the idea
>>>> proposed. The draft is incomplete for now and is a basic version of the
>>>> final proposal. The reason for posting the incomplete proposal here is
>>>> that
>>>> , I had some queries regarding my proposal, and it would be great if
>>>> they
>>>> were answered before moving forward.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is the project proposed too short or too long to be finished within
>>>> the
>>>> time frame?
>>>> 2) Are more details required on the implementation of the proposed
>>>> topics?
>>>>
>>>> I have only written about the first part of my project in the proposal.
>>>> Soon
>>>> i would provide the details of the two other parts, once I know whether
>>>> I am
>>>> going in the right way.
>>>> Here is the link to my proposal
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ex_4Up9gGowGGW0SO16ARx_CeU75dGpqME7nDaDFnlI/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ex_4Up9gGowGGW0SO16ARx_CeU75dGpqME7nDaDFnlI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Lpf0oSV5GSvjHKRPW0H8rYk6hP2_7566gzx2W6oe0QPICUiO3-F0XrwkLJYayARX7jbIdXnWaA$>
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to hear from the mentors.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ayush
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from: http://boost-geometry.203548.n3.nabble.com/
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://boost-geometry.203548.n3.nabble.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Lpf0oSV5GSvjHKRPW0H8rYk6hP2_7566gzx2W6oe0QPICUiO3-F0XrwkLJYayARX7jbn-5Bw9A$>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geometry mailing list
>>>> Geometry_at_[hidden]
>>>> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Lpf0oSV5GSvjHKRPW0H8rYk6hP2_7566gzx2W6oe0QPICUiO3-F0XrwkLJYayARX7jYxKplbDg$>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geometry mailing list
>>> Geometry_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Lpf0oSV5GSvjHKRPW0H8rYk6hP2_7566gzx2W6oe0QPICUiO3-F0XrwkLJYayARX7jYxKplbDg$>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Geometry mailing listGeometry_at_[hidden]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Lpf0oSV5GSvjHKRPW0H8rYk6hP2_7566gzx2W6oe0QPICUiO3-F0XrwkLJYayARX7jYxKplbDg$
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geometry mailing list
> Geometry_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry
>