Would it be possible to send a WKT (or other description of your input data so that we can reproduce the problem?

Another question: what kind of geometries do you pass as in bg::union_ as input? Are they polygons, rings or multi-polygons? Have you checked whether they are defined properly? By my last question I mean that your data conforms with the type of geometry you use: if you use a counter-clockwise ring, the data should also be in counter-clockwise sequence.

On 04/08/2014 05:14 μμ, Andrew Hundt
wrote:

A coworker is running into an issue while attempting to run union_(), and I was hoping you may be able to provide some feedback on what the problem may be. I've included an abridged version of the emails below. Any help or ideas would be very much appreciated.

Cheers!

Andrew Hundt

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::geometry::overlay_invalid_input_exception'what(): Boost.Geometry Overlay invalid input exception

So this is what is happening:

The self intersection happens after you take a union of the above two rings.

I tried calling simplify on the multi_polygon, but that just made the multi_polygon of size zero. I then tried calling simplify on each polygon inside the multi_polygon, but that just made the size of each polygon inside zero. I’ve tried different size parameters for simplify, including 1, 2, 5, all with the same effect.

As usual, it is really too bad the documentation for boost is so terrible. I would probably like it a lot more if it had reasonable documentation. Just getting to the above point, figuring out things like how to even get the points out of a multi_polygon has taken me hours, and I have no idea why simplify just makes everything size zero.

As of boost 1.56 (and in the current develop branch), there is a very easy way to do this, but still undocumented: there is a iterator iterating over the points of a geometry. So for you could do something like this:

MultiPolygon /* my multipolygon type */ mpoly;

boost::geometry::point_iterator<MultiPolygon> first = boost::geometry::points_begin(mpoly);

boost::geometry::point_iterator<MultiPolygon> last = boost::geometry::points_end(mpoly);

boost::geometry::point_iterator<MultiPolygon> it;

for (it = first; it != last; ++it)

{

// do what you want here

}

In case you want a const iterator, replace "boost::geometry::point_iterator<MultiPolygon>" above by "boost::geometry::point_iterator<MultiPolygon const>".

Best,

- m.

On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Andrew Hundt <ahundt@nrec.ri.cmu.edu> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Carl Wellington <carlw@cmu.edu> wrote:

overlay_invalid_input_exception

Here is some info on it:

Basically it means there is some self intersection. May need to do something like call simplify in between union operations.

A few more quick observations:

The multi-polygon after calling union on the red and blue rings in the figure has two polygons: one of size 17 (the size of the first ring to be added) and one of size 23. This multi-polygon self intersects so I guess something goes wrong with the union and that’s why there are two polygons when I expect there should only be one.

If I try convex_hull on each polygon inside the multi-polygon after the union, then as soon as I add a single ring to the multi-polygon using union and run convex_hull on the first polygon, the size goes from 17 to 28 and it self-intersects. This seems very odd and I’m probably doing something wrong since it’s just a single convex ring.

Any ideas for what to try next?

-Carl

_______________________________________________ Geometry mailing list Geometry@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry