Glad to hear that! I'll be waiting for changes.
Thank you very much for all your efforts in creating excelent libraryBest regards, Oleg2016-04-20 18:26 GMT+03:00 Barend Gehrels <email@example.com>:Hi Oleg,
Op 14-4-2016 om 0:54 schreef Oleg Evseev:
I've tried to use boost 1.61.0 beta for my case. And instead of getting problems with zero areas, I'm getting really wrong result - union ignore one of the mpolygons (without exceptions). I created ticket with WKT https://svn.boost.org/trac/boo
appended mpolygon (the red one - two trinangles) is ignored. union result is equal to current path (the yellow one - two trinangles)
Maybe this is caused by the shared point of two trinangels in one multipolygon?
Thanks for the reports. It is indeed not solved yet. I updated the tickets. It is caused somehow by the precision and need some further study. We plan to change the details of the implementation w.r.t. precision/rescaling for one of the coming versions. Hopefully asap of course, but these things take a longer time.
Geometry mailing list