Subject: Re: [proto] Funky exercie: subset of Boost::parameters using proto
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-15 14:38:40
On 15/08/10 20:21, Daniel Wallin wrote:
> So you implemented something significantly slower (3 times on machine
> with gcc4.3). Not very surprising; adding complex abstraction in the
> implementation rarely makes things faster.
As I said, it's more of an exercice than anything else.
Proto list run by eric at boostpro.com