Subject: Re: [proto] Thoughts on traversing proto expressions and reusing grammar
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-15 03:22:09
On 10/14/2010 11:04 PM, Joel Falcou wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Dispatch to transforms on grammar rules.
> wait Jolly Jumper ! Does this means I could traverse a SIMD EDSL AST
> in search for a*b+c at the *visitor* level and not requiring to
> transform the AST beforehand by dispacthing over
> plus<X,mutilpliex<Y,Z>> ?
> If yes, sign me up :o
Goodness Joel, I have no idea what you're asking. What's the "visitor
level"? Why would you have to transform the AST? What are you trying to
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Proto list run by eric at boostpro.com