Subject: Re: [proto] : Proto transform with state
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-17 14:18:04
On 17/11/10 19:46, Eric Niebler wrote:
> See the attached code. I wish I had a better answer. It sure would be
> nice to generalize this for other times when new state needs to bubble
> up and back down.
Just chiming in. We had the exact same problem in quaff where needed to
carry on a process ID over the trasnform of parallel statement. If it can
make you worry less Eric, we ended with the exact same workaround.
Proto list run by eric at boostpro.com