Proto for Boost mailing list page: Re: [proto] [proto-11] expression extension

Subject: Re: [proto] [proto-11] expression extension
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-06 09:46:05

On 06/06/2012 08:24, Eric Niebler wrote:

> The template template parameter is distasteful, I agree, but I can shave
> template instantiations this way. There's no need to instantiate a
> nested apply template for every new expression type created. Especially
> now with template aliases, it's quite painless to adapt a template to
> have the interface that make_custom_expr expects. That was my reasoning,
> at least.

I hadn't considered template aliases, I guess with those it is just fine.