Boost Mailing Lists Home Page Search Boost List Archive


Limit search to:
Sort by:
 Results for setjmp+gil   16 to 30 of 44 results. Run time: 0.058 seconds | Search time: 0.054 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 14
16 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release -- rank: 750
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at_[hidden] ) Date ... iterators and alternatives" In reply to: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" Next in thread: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" Hi Domagoj, thanks for hard work. I ... below: > Hi, a while back I wrote about using alternative GIL.IO backend > implementations that would use native libraries/functionality ( ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-10-18 06:25:45 UTC
17 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) -- rank: 736
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) From: John Bytheway ( jbytheway+boost ... the Boost.Process" In reply to: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg)" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test. ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-03-25 06:06:38 UTC
18 Boost mailing page: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review -- rank: 736
... Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review From: Edd Dawson ( lists_at_[hidden] ) Date ... 10:22 Next message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Previous message: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [trac] Performance ... week?" Next in thread: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Reply: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Reply: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Reply: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Half- ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-08 07:19:51 UTC
19 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 729
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at_[hidden] ) Date: 2010 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" In reply to: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Hi Phil, > >> Sorry, there is a misunderstanding ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-07 07:26:07 UTC
20 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) -- rank: 719
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at ... the boost libraries]" In reply to: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg)" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test. ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-03-26 06:07:09 UTC
21 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) -- rank: 715
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg) From: Phil Endecott ( spam_from ... with Boost development" In reply to: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg)" Next in thread: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test. ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-03-23 06:08:03 UTC
22 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release -- rank: 708
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release From: Domagoj Saric ( dsaritz_at_[hidden] ) Date ... Gehrels: "Re: [boost] [geometry]" In reply to: Christian Henning: "[boost] [gil] New IO release" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" Reply: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" Reply: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] [gil] New IO release" From: "Christian Henning" <chhenning_at_[hidden]> ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-10-12 06:24:29 UTC
23 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 708
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at_[hidden] ) Date: 2010 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Hi Phil, On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at ... the error paths >>> that >>> we discussed at length (e.g. setjmp/longjmp) a few months ago? >> >> Every time you read/ ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-06 07:13:58 UTC
24 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 708
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Phil Endecott ( spam_from_boost_dev_at ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Christian Henning wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 ... the error paths >>>> that we discussed at length (e.g. setjmp/longjmp) a few months ago? > Sorry, there is a ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-06 07:13:57 UTC
25 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review -- rank: 705
... view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at_[hidden] ) Date ... std::bitset" In reply to: Edd Dawson: "[boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Next in thread: Edd Dawson: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Reply: Edd Dawson: "Re: [boost] Half-baked GIL IO extension review" Hi Edd, thanks for taking the time ... wstring, char*, and filesystem::basic_path ( when compiling with BOOST_GIL_IO_ADD_FS_PATH_SUPPORT ) to define a filename. ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-08 07:19:35 UTC
26 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 698
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Phil Endecott ( spam_from_boost_dev_at ... 06 10:24:03 Next message: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] [gil io_new review] Reading images from in-memory sources" Previous ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] Formal Review ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-08 07:19:52 UTC
27 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 681
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Phil Endecott ( spam_from_boost_dev_at ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" In reply to: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Christian Henning: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Christian Henning wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-05 07:16:07 UTC
28 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 681
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Domagoj Saric ( dsaritz_at_[hidden] ) Date: 2010 ... Sun CC without STLPort" Previous message: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [gil io_new review] Reading images from in-memorysources" In reply ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Andreas Pokorny: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Reply: Andreas Pokorny: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev_at_[ ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-09 07:17:07 UTC
29 ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW -- rank: 671
... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW From: Domagoj Saric ( domagoj.saric_at_[hidden] ) Date ... boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW" "Andreas Pokorny" <andreas.pokorny_at_[hidden]> wrote in ... jpeg loader, but I switched to lodepng for the > non-gil code. IMO GIL.IO should not make the decision on the backends ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-10 07:12:39 UTC
30 Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] GIL IO extension review -- rank: 647
... view Thread view Subject view Author view Subject: Re: [boost] GIL IO extension review From: Christian Henning ( chhenning_at_[hidden] ) Date ... Workaround for compiler bugs" Previous message: Kenny Riddile: "Re: [boost] [gil io_new review] Reading images from in-memory sources" In reply to: Kenny Riddile: "[boost] GIL IO extension review" Hi Kenny, thanks a lot for your ... it. >  I've been using the new version of the GIL IO extension for over a year now > and am glad ... or suspicious.  I have some concerns > about the usage of setjmp/longjmp in the PNG and JPEG implementations > (honestly I ...
Poster's Name:
Poster's Email:
Message Date: 2010-12-07 07:26:06 UTC
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 14