Re: [Threads-devel] More problems with condition

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-21 03:27:48

Quoting Kimon Hoffmann <Kimon.Hoffmann_at_[hidden]>:

> For now we have resorted to switching back to Boost 1.34.1 but since
> Boost 1.35.0 includes a few important fixes to other libraries it would
> be really great if a fix for this would make it into 1.35.1.

I'm working on it.

> One question about the spurious-wake-prevention: Is the absence of
> spurious wakes one of the guarantees made by the threading library
> proposal?

No. In general, spurious wakes cannot be prevented. However, I would  
like to minimize them as much as possible.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Williams            | Just Software Solutions Ltd
Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL