Re: [Threads-devel] boost futures vs C++0x futures

Subject: Re: [Threads-devel] boost futures vs C++0x futures
From: Matthias Vallentin (vallentin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-04 04:20:56

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:44:51PM +0000, Anthony Williams wrote:
> * The get_state, is_ready, has_value and has_exception members have gone.

Did the removal of has_exception change the exception propagation
semantics? For example, will and exception thrown from a packaged_task
propagate?

   Matthias
-- 
Matthias Vallentin
vallentin_at_[hidden]
http://www.icir.org/matthias