Le 18/01/13 09:17, Fredrik Orderud a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Le 17/01/13 20:00, Fredrik Orderud a écrit :
have you had time to take a look at my updated patch yet?

If you're concerned about the size of the patch, then I would be more than happy to divide it up into smaller "bite-sized" change-sets that can be reviewed more easily.

I'm busy fixing some bugs to be included on Boost 1.53. I will take in account your patch on two weeks. You don't need to change the patch, I've the impression that it is good enough, but I don't want to destabilize release 1.53 with this refactoring. We will have enough time for release 1.54.

For the time been you could try to adapt your patch to shared priority mutex in a different file.

That's ok Vicente. I understand, and will await the 1.53 release before proceeding.


I will start to analyze your patch this week.

I don't know if you have followed this ticket.
#7906 Very bad performance of generic implementation of shared_mutex on windows

From the performances presented it seems that the windows specific implementation will be needed, so maybe a windows specific implementation for shared priority mutex should also be needed. The problem is that the windows implementation contains some bugs and missing features.