Re: [ublas] uBLAS regressions/unsupported compilers

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-11 17:09:12

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> If all the compilers that currently show up as uBLAS regressions on
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.html
> are indeed not supported, could somebody please mark them up
> correspondingly in "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml"
> (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml)
> ?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

for test3 of ublas I would like to keep the remark of Stefan for 
intel-win32-8_1 and apply remark with 'refid = 30' of Michael Stevens 
for the two gcc-2.95's. Should I modify explicit-markup-failure.xml as 
below for doing that ?

         <test name="test3">
             <mark-failure>
                 <toolset name="intel-win32-8_1"/>
                 <note author="S. Slapeta" refid="3"/>
                 <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-linux"/>
                 <toolset name="gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3-linux"/>
                 <note author="M.Stevens" refid="6"/>
             </mark-failure>
         </test>

Or should I use two <mark-failure> blocks or ...?