From: Michael Stevens (m-stevens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-16 16:07:16
Sorry I automatically post to the old mailing list again!
On Sunday 16 January 2005 18:25, Toon Knapen wrote:
> Michael Stevens wrote:
> > To me it look like the CVS HEAD is still broken. Karl's vector_temporary
> > deduction seems only to be half implemented. Toon is it possible that
> > when you committed the merged uBLAS_pure plus patches you missed
> > something out?
> Could you be more specific. I don't see what is broken actually? I ran
> the regression tests succesfully and we are using it in other internal
The errors show up directly in the test1 regression test. I see the same
failures as are shown by GCC and other compilers.
Have a look at.
The most logical explanation would be that one or more files did not get
committed. Can you check what is in CVS is in sync with what you have?