From: Michael Stevens (m-stevens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-18 05:11:09
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:35, Toon Knapen wrote:
> Michael Stevens wrote:
> >>>To me it look like the CVS HEAD is still broken. Karl's vector_temporary
> >>>deduction seems only to be half implemented. Toon is it possible that
> >>>when you committed the merged uBLAS_pure plus patches you missed
> >>>something out?
> Indeed there has been some confusion during the merge. But Karl fixed it
> all and I tested it on my machine with gcc-3.4.3 and all seems to work
> fine now. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Thats great. I see the changes to matrix_proxy and vector_proxy in CVS.