|
|
Ublas : |
From: Paul C. Leopardi (leopardi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-27 11:55:08
Hi all,
I also think that the resurrection of MTL would be interesting. I originally
used MTL for GluCat, then switched to uBLAS. See http://glucat.sf.net and
http://www.osl.iu.edu/MailArchives/mtl-devel/msg00244.php and
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=239344
Longer term, I would like to redesign GluCat using concepts and traits.
http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost-users/msg06695.php
In particular, I would like to define a Clifford Algebra concept, and relate
it to Field, Ring, Linear Algebra, etc. I am therefore interested in how
algebra concept checking works in practice.
Longer term probably means after August. I have to hand in a PhD thesis before
then. http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~leopardi/
Best regards
On Thursday 27 January 2005 21:05, David Abrahams wrote:
> Thomas Lemaire <thomas.lemaire_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >> The project site for the MTL rewrite is now live.
> >> http://boost-consulting.com/projects/mtl.
> >
> > It seems very interesting, is it going to replace ublas ? Or is it
> > complementary ?
> >
> > From what I understand, ublas+binding does nearly the same job as the
> > future MTL, could some one point out the differences ?
>
> Please see the 2nd article -- the first one by me -- in
> http://tinyurl.com/499fw
> (http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3cueknui2ek.fsf%40boost%2d
>consulting.com%3e)