Re: [ublas] Transition to default handling of possible lvalue aliases

From: Kresimir Fresl (fresl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 00:45:39

Dan Elliott wrote:

> Michael Stevens wrote:

>>Would the change of semantics be a big problem for anyone?

> I would like to express my feeling it is good library behavior to 
> *always* provide the correct answer while *allowing* the intelligent 
> user to optimize.  I am under the impression that uBLAS, in its current 
> state, gives us both.  Therefore, although this has been an 
> enlightening, necessary conversation, I fear it is going to yield no 
> additional features while decreasing its usability.

Agreed.

fres