Re: [ublas] allocate bypassing contruction

From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-16 11:22:38

On Tuesday 16 August 2005 15:15, Neal Becker wrote:
> IIUC, I can provide my own allocator, but the call to new is going to call
> the constructor, correct?

Correct. It is worth noting for builtin types (and classes with trivial 
default constructors) the array placement new gets completely optimised away 
on good compilers.

Michael