Re: [ublas] compilation error using prod()

From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-08 07:29:04

On Donnerstag 08 September 2005 09:24, Patrick Kowalzick wrote:
> >> -Somewhere there is a gcc bug report. I have to search it in my emails.
> >
> > I remember this report. I thought it had Joergs name on it as reporter. I
> > spent a while searching GCC bugzilla and I can't find it. If you still
> > have a
> > reference it would be very useful.
>
> I found it. In my mails (I was also unable to find it on the gcc-site):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12536

That is the one. I final found that search for 'reporter' as 'walter' works.
'Joerg' however fails as it only matches the email address in the <> and not 
the formated display name. Easy to find when you no the bug id!!

Any idea how to proceed. If the new behaviour of GCC is correct then the only 
solution will be to remove prod<> or rename it.

I'm really not sure if DR214 mandates this however. The fact that intel-8.1 
finds it unambiguous is indicative that there may be something wrong.

The new behaviour is rather uggly however. The fact that
        expression<E>
and
        S
from my test case are different with regards to ambiguity is also strange.

Regards,
        Michael