|
|
Ublas : |
From: Shawn D. Pautz (sdpautz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-30 17:13:04
Michael,
My apologies - I had seen the fix in the head previously (prior to the
beta release of 1.33.1), and had assumed it had been changed back in
1.33.1. It looks like the 1.33.1 branch was formed prior to the head
fix, so the fix never was in 1.33.1. I had locally modified my copy of
1.33.0 to have the fix, assuming that it would show up in 1.33.1. Sorry
for my confusion.
I see the CVS repository for the head, but where do I access the 1.33.1
branch to checkout the fix?
Shawn
Michael Stevens wrote:
>On Tuesday, 29. November 2005 22:53, Shawn D. Pautz wrote:
>
>
>>All,
>>
>>There is a difference between 1.33.0 and 1.33.1 Beta that is causing me
>>some problems with gcc 3.4.4. In class vector the typedef for pointer
>>and const_pointer has changed from being public to being private. Was
>>this intended?
>>
>>
>
>The private pointer/const_pointer change is prior to 1.33.0. About a year ago
>I believe.
>
>
>
>>I'll note that the documentation for the Vector concept
>>still indicates that it is a refinement of RandomAccessContainer, which
>>requires a public typedef.
>>
>>
>
>Bad. An oversight. The Concepts tests only check for the to common
>requirements of all classes which model a Vector. The specific Random Access
>Container requirement of ublas:vector is not specifically checked.
>
>I have commited a FIX to the 1_33 branch. The HEAD already has the correct
>public versions.. Can you test?
>
>
>
>>I thought there had been discussion of
>>dropping that requirement - am I looking at the right documentation?
>>
>>
>
>I looked up my previous post on the subject.
>
>Quote "
>Importantly I have removed Random Access Container from the list of Concepts
>refined by Vector. The problem is that Random Access Container requires the
>iterator to be a Random Access Iterator. Not all Vector's can provide this.
>
>Instead I have made ublas::vector a model of Random Access Container. This
>makes sense as the aim of introducing a relationship with Random Access
>Container was avoid surprises by people using ublas::vector as a std::vector.
>"
>
>Hope that all make sense.
>
>Michael
>
>