Re: [ublas] real_type

From: Russ (c.r.coggrave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-22 23:32:40

Russ <c.r.coggrave <at> phasevision.com> writes:

> 
> I would be grateful if someone could please clarify the interpretation of 
> real_type as used in the uBlas code.
> 
> Is it intended to indicate the type of the real component of a value, as 
opposed 
> to the type of the imaginary component?
> 
> OR
> 
> Is it intended to indicate a floating point number type?

On further analysis, it looks like the former.