Re: [ublas] why vector_of_vector?

From: Manoj Rajagopalan (rmanoj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-03 20:01:06

Sorry, I take back this question. The difference is obvious within the 
resizing member functions.

I can see that each vector can be accessed using *i where i is of type 
iterator1. But is there a reason as to why the contained vectors cannot 
be accessed using the [] operator?

thanks
Manoj

Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
> hi all
> 
>    the matrix<> and vector_of_vector<> class seem to have the same 
> interface. Why do we then need the latter?
> 
> thanks
> Manoj
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas