Re: [ublas] Cholesky factorization

From: Karl Meerbergen (Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-20 11:18:54

In principle, it would be ok to have the ublas-specializations
(numeric/bindings/traits/ublas_vector.hpp and matrix.hpp) of the
bindings in the ublas distribution. The bindings themselves can stay in
the boost-sandbox.

One of the reasons is that people who have write access to the
boost-sandbox do not necessarily have access to ublas (myself for example).

Karl

Quoting Jeffrey Brent McBeth <mcbeth_at_[hidden]>:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:38:21PM +0100, Gunter Winkler wrote:
> > Jeffrey Brent McBeth schrieb:
> > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:23:40AM +0100, Gunter Winkler wrote:
> > > <snip> 
> > >   
> > >> So we decided to only support the necessary data types and rely
> on 
> > >> bindings.
> > >>     
> > >
> > > This would be a lot more reasonable (meant in a polite way) if
> the bindings
> > > were part of the distribution rather than hidden away in the
> sandbox and
> > > often broken.
> > >   
> > 
> > Any volunteers? I gladly accept patches ;-)
> 
> I do have patches, and will get them sent in.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -- 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hofstadter's Law states: It always takes longer than you expect, even
> when
> you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>