From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-03 02:29:29
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 18:28, Gross, Steve wrote:
> (2) Yeah, it still is annoying to have to do this. I really want to be
> able to pass around vector_range's without having to know what the
> underlying type is (matrix row or column, that is).
This can only be done using an (abstract) base class and virtual functions.
However, this kills performance.