From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-24 10:04:21
Am Freitag, 23. November 2007 17:02 schrieb dariomt_at_[hidden]:
> Reusing the underlying memory is still a requirement for me. Any
> ideas on why isn't that possible?
You can always use the preserving resize of this vector. However this
may require a copy of the old data.