Subject: Re: [ublas] numeric-bindings: current issues on 64-bit platforms
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-11 02:40:06
Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Thomas Klimpel wrote:
>> Good to hear. So I should probably try to do something about gbsv and
>> gels*. When this is done, I would like to change the type used to bind
>> against fortran integer from "int" to a typedef like "integer_t", because
>> "int" is not always the correct type on 64 platforms.
Sorry for not being up-to-date around this issue. What width does the
correct type have? Is this something where <cstdint>'s family of int32_t,
int64_t, etc. can be of help?