Subject: Re: [ublas] Why is there no constructor taking an initial value?
From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-22 15:08:53
Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009 16:13 schrieb Thorsten Ottosen:
> I was a bit surprised that there is no way to fill a
> triangular_matrix with a default value. Say, I would have expected
> this to work:
> triangular_matrix<double> m(42,42,42);
> Is there any reason why this constructor is not provided?
because it is not needed: