Subject: Re: [ublas] size1 and size2
From: Jesse Perla (jesseperla_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 08:15:02
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Marco Guazzone <marco.guazzone_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Gunter Winkler <guwi17_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hmmm, but in this way we risk to give an inconsistent interface.
> In MTL4 we have both member functions and free functions
What have your experiences with MTL4 been? Is it ready to be considered as
a matrix library? Do you think it will be the ublas successor eventually?