Subject: Re: [ublas] Numeric traits for ublas bounded_vector and matrix
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 04:20:16
Jesse Perla wrote:
> Jesse Perla <jesseperla <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> > proposing a static_matrix and static_vector to ublas would be the way
>> > (if you want to stick to boost/ublas for your container needs)?
> Wait a sec..... have I been a complete idiot for a full year? Should I be
> using c_vector and c_matrix instead of the bounded_vector bounded_matrix?
AFAICT, the c_matrix/c_vector stuff also has dynamic sizes (see the size1_
and size2_ members). In terms of behaviour, I think it's identical to the