Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Status?
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-16 06:17:21
Karsten Ahnert wrote:
> I am relatively new on this list and I want to ask, what is the current
> status of the numeric_bindings library?
> We are developing a library for
> solving ODEs and need an interface for matrix and vector types as well
> as some LA algorithms. Is it a good idea to rely an numeric_bindings or is
> it in an early alpha stage?
When you want to use blas or lapack anyway, using the numeric_bindings (or numeric_bindings-v1) is a better idea than trying to roll your own bindings.
If you use the numeric_bindings as a general matrix and vector interface, you will basically inherit the continuous memory representations imposed by blas/cblas/clapack/lapack. Using a std::deque as "vector type" won't work then.